The defendant’s lawyers don’t like it. The plaintiffs’ lawyers aren’t talking, but some of their colleagues say they don’t like it either.

The focus of this double-sided antipathy is a recent decision by a three-judge panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The unanimous ruling allows trial judges to reduce punitive damages awards they find “unconstitutionally excessive” and to do so without offering plaintiffs the choice of a new trial.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]