New York’s Rape Shield Law does not bar a prosecutor from introducing evidence of a victim’s sexual history to show why she failed to immediately inform her husband she had been raped, the Appellate Division, First Department, has ruled.

A unanimous court also ruled that evidence of the victim’s chastity was properly admitted in the case, People v. Richard Wigfall, because it was relevant to the defendant’s claim that the alleged rape was a consensual sexual encounter in exchange for employment.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]