As the Kosovars’ suffering adds a somber note to the celebration of NATO’s 50th anniversary this week, so NATO’s military intervention in Yugoslavia highlights a discomfiting chasm that has developed not simply between NATO and the United Nations, but also between the ideal of justice and the rule of law.

So far, NATO members have attempted to talk around and over that split. But the legitimacy of the Yugoslav intervention, which has proceeded without the authorization of the U.N. Security Council, and that of all future interventions cannot rest on well-meant obfuscation. NATO must urge the rethinking of international understandings so that both law and justice can be served.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]