The trustees of a family trust created by the late Henry S. McNeil Sr., of the world-renowned McNeil Laboratories, did not abuse their discretion in a series of decisions challenged by McNeil’s adult son, Henry Jr., who wanted $28 million of the trust’s principal distributed to him.

n the Chancery Court case of Bishop v. McNeil, Vice Chancellor Leo E. Strine Jr. noted that the case regrettably pitted “child against father and fiduciary against beneficiary” in a bitter dispute over the administration of the trust. But while the trustees acted in good faith, Strine wrote, “The process they used brings to mind scrapple-making. It was not very appetizing to behold, but its end product was satisfying.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]