In a ruling one attorney called "the most significant health care decision" to be made in years, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed with a doctor's request to obtain the audiotape from a peer-review proceeding. The doctor claimed certain members of the review organization with ulterior motives fiddled with the wording of a recommendation to terminate his suspension, having a detrimental effect on his record.
October 06, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
In a ruling one attorney called “the most significant health care decision” to be made in years, the state Supreme Court has agreed with a doctor’s request to obtain the audiotape from a peer-review proceeding.
The doctor’s reasons for wanting the tape led the unanimous court to rule in his favor. He claimed certain members of the review organization with ulterior motives fiddled with the wording of a recommendation to terminate his suspension, having a detrimental effect on his record.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
