The U.S. Constitution prohibits striking a juror from a panel on the basis of religion, the Connecticut Supreme Court has declared, prohibiting use of the peremptory challenge beyond just the race and gender categories currently recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a decision bound to spark new issues in civil and criminal jury trials, a divided panel in State v. Hodge builds on the U.S. Supreme Court landmark of Batson v. Kentucky, which outlawed race-based juror challenges in 1986. It was followed in 1994 with the case of J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel T.B., a quasi-criminal paternity and support case, which extended the Batson doctrine to gender-based strikes.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]