Last Monday's workers' compensation ruling by the New Jersey Supreme Court in favor of the widow of a welder who died of lung cancer looks like an important victory for plaintiffs and evidence that the liberal impulse is alive among New Jersey's justices. So why does a lawyer who represents workers' comp claimants and who filed an amicus brief on behalf of trade and industrial unions say the case created a huge procedural burden on the Division of Workers' Compensation.
August 16, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Last Monday’s workers’ compensation ruling by the stateSupreme Court in favor of the widow of a welder who died of lungcancer looks like an important victory for plaintiffs andevidence that the liberal impulse is alive among New Jersey’sjustices.
So why does a lawyer who represents workers’ comp claimantsand who filed an amicus brief on behalf of trade and industrialunions hate the decision?
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
