Because an anti-abortionprotester had a history of harassing and abusive conduct, a court orderthat he avoid an expanded buffer zone outside a Connecticut abortion clinicdoes not violate the First Amendment, a federal appeals panel has ruled.

A divided three-judge panelof the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit also found that StanleyG. Scott was legitimately ordered to observe a “floating buffer zone” ofat least eight feet around women entering a Bridgeport clinic because Mr.Scott had repeatedly violated the court’s injunctions in United Statesv. Scott, 98-6087.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]