ALBANY � Addressing its first civil appeal of a sex offender’s risk assessment under Megan’sLaw, the Appellate Division, Third Department, upheld a decision imposing the “sexually violent predator” classification on a pedophilewho qualified for a lower risk level under state guidelines.

Although the offender would have been placed in the mid-level risk category under a strictapplication of the guidelines, the court ruled in a decision last week that the determination by state probation officials to depart from theguidelines and place him in the most restrictive category was not arbitrary or capricious in view of his criminal history.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]