A federal whistle-blower case against a group of medical therapy companies has turned into a vicious game of "remove the lawyer." Last month, the whistle-blower's lawyer argued that defense counsel had to withdraw because of a conflict of interests. Now the defense's replacements have brought removal motions against the whistle-blower's lawyer. Trial watchers say that such removal motions are becoming a common litigation weapon nationwide.
July 01, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A federal whistle-blower case against a group of medical therapy companieshas turned into a vicious game of “remove the lawyer.”
Last month, the whistle-blower’s lawyer argued that Troutman Sanders couldnot ethically defend the companies because the firm suffered from a badcase of conflicting interests.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
