WASHINGTON -� In a pair of rulings yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court partly disappointed prisoners’ lawyers seeking to avoid an onerous cap on their fees and completely frustrated a group of scofflaws — federal judges — trying to get out from under a local tax.

The fee cap ruling in Martin v. Hadix, 98-262, will likely have the broader financial impact of the two. In Michigan alone, the decision will result in “hundreds of thousands of dollars” in savings, according to Michigan Solicitor General Thomas L. Casey. He added that savings nationwide probably will reach well into the millions when other affected states apply the new ruling. But the ruling also will mean the release of thousands of dollars in attorney fees withheld, according to prisoner rights litigators, because of conflicting circuit interpretations of the federal Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]