For years, DuPont steadfastly maintained that its fungicide Benlate was not contaminated with an herbicide. In the early 1990s, the chemical giant began settling cases, without admitting guilt and for relatively small sums, that had been brought by growers around the country who claimed that the fungicide designed to protect their plants had instead killed them.

It appeared that litigation over Benlate was winding down. But in 1994, a San Francisco attorney made a startling discovery. That discovery has resulted in scores of Benlate-related suits creeping back onto court dockets, has raised the ante by several million dollars, and may blow up the previously reached settlements.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]