Proving a federal trademark dilution claim may be more difficult if courts follow the Fourth Circuit’s controversial decision in Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Showsv. Utah Div. of Travel Dev. [FOOTNOTE 1]

There, the Court of Appeals affirmed a decision of the federal District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The trial court had ruled that use of the slogan “The Greatest Snow on Earth” for Utah’s winter sports attractions did not dilute Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey’s “The Greatest Show on Earth” service mark for circus performances in violation of Section 43(c) of the Lanham Act. [FOOTNOTE 2]In reaching its decision, the Fourth Circuit concluded that “to establish dilution of a famous mark under the federal Act requires proof that (1) a defendant has made use of a junior mark sufficiently similar to the famous mark to evoke in a relevant universe of consumers a mental association of the two that (2) has caused (3) actual economic harm to the famous mark’s economic value by lessening its former selling power as an advertising agent for its goods or services.”� [FOOTNOTE 3]

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]