An HMO cannot remove a medical malpractice lawsuit to federal court on ERISA preemption grounds merely because the plaintiff alleges that the insurer established “disincentives” to providing proper care since such a claim focuses on the quality — not the quantity — of care, a federal judge has ruled.

In his 12-page opinion in DeLucia v. St. Luke’s Hospital et al., U.S. District Judge Robert S. Gawthrop III found that Aetna U.S. Healthcare had not proven that the plaintiffs’ claims were completely preempted by ERISA and therefore remanded the case to the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]