Plaintiffs who sue under the Americans with Disabilities Act must prove that discrimination against them is intentional in order to win compensatory damages, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Thursday.

“In the absence of proof of discriminatory animus, compensatory relief should not be allowed,” wrote Seventh Circuit Judge Harlington Wood Jr., who was sitting by designation. Judge Pamela Rymer concurred, while Judge A. Wallace Tashima dissented in Ferguson v. City of Phoenix , 98 C.D.O.S. 6943.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]