A letter written by a woman to her live-in companion, which promised the companion a 50/50 split of the couple’s assets if their relationship ended after the two moved together from New York to Atlanta, is an enforceable contract, a Manhattan Supreme Court justice has ruled.

Justice Herman Cahn rejected claims by the woman, Meril Joseph, that the letter was not enforceable because it did not obligate her companion, Christine Oms, to move to Atlanta, and merely set forth a promise by Ms. Joseph, unsupported by any consideration.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]