Nearly a decade ago, the notion of trading an unpredictable jury verdict and increasing costs and delay in the civil trial process for mandatory binding arbitration in discrimination cases sounded like a good idea to many California employers.
Seeking a simpler, less costly and speedier forum to resolve employment disputes, some non-union employers began including mandatory arbitration clauses in their employment agreements.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
