Arbitration is, as it should be, the principal method for the resolution of international business disputes. But clients should be advised of the costs of committing to international arbitration. This paper highlights some of the drawbacks of arbitrating international disputes, including limited rights to discovery, injunctive relief, joinder -- and appeal.
June 04, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Don’t get us wrong. We believe in arbitration, and believe that it is and should be the principal method for the resolution of international business disputes.
However, we also advise our clients of the costs of committing to international arbitration. While arbitration’s virtues are often celebrated in print, the potential defects in the process are not so well-publicized. Following are some of the practical limits on international arbitration:
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
