Opponents of multidisciplinary practices claim that MDPs will lower professional standards for lawyers. And at least one Big Five accounting firm seems bound and determined to prove that its multidisciplinary practice has a considerably more casual attitude towards rules and regulations than most law firms do.

A recent investigation of PricewaterhouseCoopers detailed more than 8,000 ethical violations by firm partners. The report handed the anti-MDP crowd a large club with which to bash the CPA firms’ legal ambitions. If the accountants don’t pay attention to their own professional rules, how can they be expected to abide by anyone else’s?

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]