The recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Rosenberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., (No. 98-1246) 1998 WL 880910 (1st Cir. Dec. 22, 1998) has been interpreted as favoring arbitration of statutory employment claims. But it also has a second, anti-arbitration theme that is also worthy of comment.

The U.S. Supreme Court has enforced pre-dispute arbitration agreements for statutory claims in a number of recent cases. [FOOTNOTE 1] These cases arise under �2 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), [FOOTNOTE 2] which requires that arbitration agreements not be singled out for special limitations not imposed on other contracts.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]