A man wanting parental rights to children conceived with his donated sperm is taking his case to the U.S. Supreme Court. Daryl Hendrix's attorneys seek to overturn a ruling by the Kansas Supreme Court, which found that a state law that doesn't give donors parental rights unless there's a written agreement is indeed constitutional. The court said the decision upholding the 1994 law was a first in the U.S. because no other state has ruled on a provision requiring a written agreement between mother and donor.
March 21, 2008 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A Topeka, Kan., man wanting parental rights to children conceived with sperm he donated is taking his case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Attorneys for Daryl Hendrix on Monday filed an appeal with the Court, seeking to overturn a Kansas Supreme Court ruling last year.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
