X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
LOS ANGELES � Lawyers who represent the personal managers of actors, musicians and other performers anticipate a drop in client disputes following a pair of recent rulings in the California Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that substantially alter the state’s Talent Agencies Act. The act regulates licensed agents. Both rulings deal with disputes between artists and their personal managers, who, although not licensed agents, frequently end up before the California labor commissioner under the act’s provisions because clients, in attempts to contest demands for unpaid commissions, make claims that their managers illegally procured work for them. Under the act, only agents are allowed to procure work for artists. If the allegations prove to be true, as they often are, the labor commissioner typically voids the entire contract � a powerful legal weapon used by artists over the years. Now, the two recent rulings could weaken that strategy. On Jan. 28, the California Supreme Court issued a closely watched ruling that allows managers to “sever” the portions of a contract found illegal under the act so that they could obtain commissions for their legal work. Marathon Entertainment Inc. v. Blasi, 174 P.3d 741 (Calif.). On Feb. 20, the U.S. Supreme Court dealt a second victory to managers in ruling that the state’s act is pre-empted by the Federal Arbitration Act in cases involving arbitration agreements. Preston v. Ferrer, No. 06-1463 (U.S.). “There will be a large chunk of these disputes that will disappear,” said Donald Smiley of the Law Offices of Donald V. Smiley in Los Angeles, who represents the manager in the California Supreme Court case. ‘Strong Medicine’ In the California Supreme Court case, Marathon Entertainment Inc. sued Rosa Blasi, an actress on the cable television series Strong Medicine, for allegedly reneging on a contract in which she agreed to pay 15% of her earnings to her personal manager. In its ruling, the California Supreme Court found that the labor commissioner, rather than voiding a contract, is allowed to sever the illegal acts of a manager from the legal ones in determining what commissions are owed. While the labor commissioner has the power to void contracts, “the power to so rule does not suggest a duty to do so in all instances,” wrote Associate Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar. The ruling eliminates most of the cases that involve small claims of procurement within large contracts, said Smiley, who represents Marathon. Blasi’s lawyer, Michael Plonsker, a partner at Dreier Stein Kahan Browne Woods George in Santa Monica, Calif., said the decision leaves disputes to be determined on a case-by-case basis. Further, the resolutions of those disputes won’t be public given the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent ruling, he said. In that case, former Florida Circuit Judge Alex Ferrer, star of the syndicated television show Judge Alex, was sued by his manager for unpaid fees. Ferrer claimed that his manager, Arnold M. Preston, had violated the act by procuring work. Preston sought to arbitrate the dispute. The Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Arbitration Act pre-empts the California act when an arbitration agreement exists. Bob Dudnik, an attorney at Los Angeles-based Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp who represents Ferrer, said the ruling means that “there will be far fewer disputes heard by the labor commissioner,” which has more expertise in this area. But Joseph Schleimer, a partner at Beverly Hills, Calif.-based Schleimer & Freundlich who represents Preston, agreed with the Supreme Court decision, saying that these disputes should have been handled by arbitrators.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.