The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed on Wednesday a nearly $600,000 judgment for a class of attorneys and law firms who were overcharged by a company that copies medical records. The court, in Liss & Marion v. Recordex Acquisition Corp. , denied all seven of Recordex's issues on appeal. The three-judge panel ruled that the class was not overly broad, summary judgment in favor of the class was appropriate and prejudgment interest in the amount of nearly $115,000 was not speculative.
December 04, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed on Wednesday a nearly $600,000 judgment for a class of attorneys and law firms who were overcharged by a company that copies medical records.
The court, in Liss & Marion v. Recordex Acquisition Corp., denied all seven of Recordex’s issues on appeal. The three-judge panel ruled that the class was not overly broad, summary judgment in favor of the class was appropriate and prejudgment interest in the amount of nearly $115,000 was not speculative.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
