X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
BOSTON — The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that a local zoning board can override local zoning requirements related to commercial uses when issuing so-called comprehensive or fast-track permits for affordable housing developments. The state’s regional planning law allows zoning boards to issue a comprehensive permit, or a single permit giving approvals normally granted by several town boards, for affordable housing. The November 20 decision said allowing a zoning board such override authority is consistent with the state legislature’s intent to make affordable housing development economically viable. Warren Jepson v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Ipswich, SJC-09914 (Mass.) “Our conclusion represents yet another instance where a yield to the regional need for affordable housing is appropriate,” said the opinion, written by Associate Justice John M. Greaney. Michael A. Tucker, an attorney with Newburyport, Mass.-based Griffin & Tucker who represented the plaintiff Ipswich Housing Authority, said the town’s argument was that the regional planning law couldn’t be used to override variances that would be required for a commercial project. “Our concern was [the law] becomes a trump card that you could put on the table and get whatever you need, a commercial variance or any sort of allowance of your project,” Tucker said. The decision is a win for the affordable housing community because it makes it clear that incidental commercial components like a laundromat or convenience store can be part of an affordable housing development under the comprehensive permit law, said Jeffrey Sacks, a Boston partner in Nixon Peabody’s affordable housing group. Sacks co-authored an amicus brief submitted by the Boston-based Citizens’ Housing & Planning Association to the court. “Affordable housing is very hard to develop if this decision had gone the other way it would have made it more difficult,” Sacks said. “These incidental commercial uses enhance the commercial variability of the projects.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.