Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
PHILADELPHIA � A plaintiffs’ firm filed suit in federal court last week in what it says is a billion-dollar class action against a group of income tax software companies for excessive fees charged for electronic filing. Feldman, Shepherd, Wohlgelernter, Tanner & Weinstock of Philadelphia filed the suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of Stacie Byers against members of an income tax software group, Free File Alliance. The suit, Byers v. Intuit Inc., alleges that group members, such as H&R Block Inc. and Intuit Inc., illegally charged millions of U.S. taxpayers excessive e-filing fees. The complaint, which was brought under the federal user charge statute, alleges that the alliance members charged fees solely based on their private business interests and not on the value to the taxpayer and the public policy interest served. The sole count of the complaint was for restitution of fees charged for electronic tax filing in violation of the Independent Offices Appropriation Act. In the complaint, Byers and the proposed class allege that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) contracted with Free File Alliance to collect e-filed federal tax returns on its behalf. The agreement the IRS made with the alliance was supposed to provide free e-filing of tax returns to 70% of Americans, the firm said. Only 3.8 million taxpayers filed their returns for free in 2006, and, in 2007, only families with adjusted gross income of less than $52,000 qualified for free filing, the firm alleged. “The name ‘Free File Alliance’ is clearly misleading,” Feldman Shepherd attorney Thomas More Marrone said in a statement. “Few taxpayers are actually eligible for free electronic filing. E-filing has become an enormous profit center for cartel members.” Marrone said in an interview that the class members would be e-filers who made more than $52,000, which has the potential for more than 70 million class members. ‘Wrongfully privatized?’ The suit names Free File Alliance as well as some of the alliance’s members � H&R Block Inc., Intuit and H&R Block Digital Tax Solutions. Marrone said the government has encouraged taxpayers to file electronically for faster processing and returns, but there is no way to do so other than through a group member. “This agreement wrongfully ‘privatized’ the IRS’ quintessential government task of developing, receiving, collecting and processing tax returns, allowing [alliance] members to reap profits by charging taxpayers and tax preparers substantial and legally unauthorized fees to electronically file returns with the IRS,” the complaint alleges. Marrone said the proposed class calls into question all fees associated with electronic filing, including the fees to file and the cost of purchasing the software for tax-return preparation. The actual cost to the IRS of e-filing because of the savings from e-filers is “either nothing or next to nothing,” Marrone said. Those who don’t qualify for free filing have to purchase software to file. Although it is one fee, there are several services bundled into that purchase, he said, and the software is only good for that year’s return. Marrone said the alliance members can sell the software because it does have value, but they shouldn’t be able to have a corner on the market and sell at whatever prices they choose. Byers and the proposed class are seeking a full refund of all fees paid for e-filing, along with injunctive relief and treble damages. In the statement, Marrone said the defendants control the “vast majority” of market share when it comes to tax-preparation software and e-filing services. In remarks made before the U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means in April 2006, Free File Alliance Executive Director Timothy D. Hugo said the IRS’ Free File Program was in its fourth year and had already saved taxpayers and the IRS millions of dollars. According to Free File Alliance’s Web site, currently 15.4 million returns have been e-filed through the alliance since 2003, and 70% of all taxpayers are eligible. Free File Alliance’s general counsel, Stephen M. Ryan of McDermott, Will & Emery, was out of the country and unavailable for comment. A spokesman for the alliance, Patrick Dorton, said in a statement that the lawsuit was without merit. “The Free File Alliance, which has been authorized and approved by the IRS and Congress, is a pro-consumer public-private partnership that has allowed more than 17 million taxpayers, most with low and moderate incomes, to file tax returns at no charge,” Dorton said. “It has been a win for taxpayers and a win for consumers.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.