Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A pending case in which qui tam plaintiffs' attorney Richard Scruggs has been charged with criminal contempt by court-appointed private prosecutors illustrates the ambiguous line in qui tam cases between blowing the whistle and potentially doing wrong in the interest of blowing the whistle. As private attorneys general, relators operate in a quasi-law enforcement capacity, wielding an ill-defined authority. Qui tam defendants have mostly borne the brunt of that ambiguity. But ambiguity can cut both ways.
November 12, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS