X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
It’s a sign of the times that a company can express relief after agreeing to settle a massive set of lawsuits for $4.9 billion. But Merck & Co.’s decision to end the Vioxx wars last week appears to be a victory for a company facing $20 billion in liability, as well as a validation of its courthouse strategy to fight each case. The settlement, negotiated over about a year, was announced Nov. 9 in New Orleans just before a status conference was scheduled in front of U.S. District Judge Eldon Fallon, who had been supervising the federal multidistrict litigation docket. The Vioxx litigation against Merck began in 2001 but exploded after the company took the prescription painkiller off the market in 2004. Since then, Merck has been hit with approximately 26,600 lawsuits, according to company documents. Defending the litigation has been expensive: Merck filings report costs of roughly $1 billion. At the peak of the litigation frenzy, some analysts estimated the company’s liability to be around $20 billion. In the past, pharmaceutical companies faced with a large set of claims frequently moved for a fast and expensive settlement. Merck chose a different path, one similar to Bayer’s strategy in the so-called Baycol litigation. Merck vowed not to settle. Instead, the company would fight each case in front of a jury. Twenty-one cases went to trial. Merck started badly in Texas, where plaintiffs lawyer W. Mark Lanier of the Lanier Law Firm won a $234.4 million verdict in 2005 representing the widow of a man who died after taking Vioxx. (The verdict is expected to be reduced.) But Merck continued to fight. Of the 20 cases tried since Lanier’s victory, 15 ended in defense verdicts or hung juries. Merck’s success in the courtroom was a stick that it used in negotiations with the plaintiffs. Andy Birchfield Jr. of Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, a key negotiator for the plaintiffs, admits that plaintiffs have had a tough time in court showing that Vioxx caused heart attacks and strokes. “We’ve seen that proving causation is challenging,” says Birchfield. Preparing the cases has been expensive for the plaintiffs bar, too. Last week’s settlement honors the contingent-fee arrangements that the plaintiffs lawyers have with their individual clients. These can run as much as 40 percent of any award. In addition, a small group of lawyers who worked on preparing discovery and taking depositions common to all the cases have asked Fallon for a maximum of 8 percent of all attorney fees awarded. Merck defense lawyer Theodore Mayer, a Hughes Hubbard & Reed partner, called the deal the “right agreement at the right time.” According to Mayer, both sides knew how many cases they had to settle. Fallon had entered an order that found the statute of limitations closed in several states, and the number of new cases had been falling in the last year, according to Mayer. The deal will be triggered once 85 percent of those who have filed claims agree to the terms. The individual awards will be determined by a three-step process that will attempt to assess the severity of plaintiffs’ injuries. The agreement also requires that the plaintiffs lawyers recommend the deal to all their Vioxx clients. In Texas, Lanier told Texas Lawyer, a sibling publication of Legal Times, that he would recommend that his 1,003 clients take the offer. “We are going to be able to get some clients some money,” he says. He estimates the average payout as between $150,000 and $200,000. Another Texas plaintiffs lawyer, Edward Blizzard, says the awards for heart attack victims might be a bit higher. “I think this is a good settlement for plaintiffs; it offers generous compensation for people who have suffered real injuries and a fair process to objectively evaluate those cases,” he says. Settlement negotiations began last December and have proceeded fitfully since, reportedly spurred on by Fallon and other judges. The final stretch began Thursday morning at the New Orleans offices of Russ Herman, liaison counsel for the plaintiffs, and wrapped up Friday morning around 5 a.m. Herman says the primary lawyers for the plaintiffs included Christopher Seeger of Seeger Weiss, Birchfield of Beasley Allen, and Arnold Levin of Levin, Fishbein, Sedrad & Berma. Merck was represented by Douglas Marvin of Williams & Connolly, John Beisner of O’Melveny & Myers, and Adam Hoeflich of Bartlitt Beck. “It was a true, hard-fought, rough and tough negotiation on a very high professional plane,” Herman tells Legal Times. Herman says a general deal was struck 10 days ago. “But the devil’s in the details, and they can break down at any point,” says Herman. “Nobody raised their voice. Or made threats. But people’s positions were very hard. It was like each lawyer had a greased football and was running like a wild monkey.”
Andrew Longstreth is a senior reporter for The American Lawyer , an ALM publication. ALM staff reporters Nathan Carlile, Mark Donald, and Brenda Sapino Jeffreys contributed to this story.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.