X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
It’s no secret that most associates don’t plan to spend their entire legal career at one law firm. But some associates are more likely to head for the exits than others. Nearly half of all white male midlevel associates say that they expect to be working at their current firm in five years, according to the Minority Experience Study published by Minority Law Journal, a sibling publication of The American Lawyer. Just over 40 percent of minority male midlevels said the same. Of the minority female midlevels, though, fewer than a third planned to stay put. Minority women seem to have more reason to want to leave big firms. This year, for the first time, the Minority Experience Study looked at both gender and racial patterns in survey responses from midlevel associates about their working life. With some exceptions, it found that midlevels’ assessments of big-firm life track along gender lines more closely than they correlate by race. The gaps in scores were small, and all groups were generally positive about their firms. Still, the score differences added up to a consistent pattern that showed women of color experiencing less satisfaction and more obstacles at large firms than their peers, including men of color. Women in general were less comfortable with the status quo-but minority female midlevels ranked their firms lower in categories almost across the board. They were least likely to recommend their firms to a job-seeking friend and least inclined to identify with partners, and they graded their firms more harshly overall. Minority men shared some of the same frustrations, especially regarding aspects of their dealings with partners, but in general, men of all races gave their firms higher marks than did white or minority women. Summer associate responses showed some of the same racial and gender divides, although they were far less pronounced. Firms take note: The question of how to build more racially inclusive law firms is not just about race. “It’s a color issue, but it’s also a gender issue,” says diversity adviser Kathy-Ann Hart of New York’s Verna Myers Consulting Group, LLC. “And gender has not historically been part of the [racial] diversity dialogue.” As in previous years, the data for the Minority Experience Report comes from responses to the Midlevel Associates Survey, conducted by The American Lawyer this spring, and the Summer Associates Survey, conducted by The American Lawyer Student Edition this summer. The report is based on the responses of 6,356 midlevel associates who identified their gender and their racial background and of 6,969 summer associates who did the same. (The 816 midlevels and 423 summer associates who did not identify their gender or race were not included in the Minority Experience Study.) Broken down by gender lines, the midlevels included 468 minority men (7.4 percent of all midlevels supplying diversity information) and 525 minority women (8.3 percent of all midlevels supplying diversity information). Of the law students surveyed, 856 were minority men (12.3 percent) and 1,040 were minority women (14.9 percent). Midlevel responses came from 189 firms, and summer associate responses from 195 firms. Most firms were on the Am Law 200 list of the highest-grossing firms in the nation. The study’s findings are based on responses from midlevel associates only, since the gap in attitudes between men and women, regardless of color, was most noticeable among midlevels. Although data from the summer associates survey, including their written responses, echoed the sentiments expressed by the midlevels in some respects, the differences between the genders and racial groups were too small to warrant much comment. It also seemed likely that the midlevel associates had a better understanding of their firms than the summer associates did. Among the midlevels, the minority men included 91 African Americans, 262 Asian Americans, and 115 Hispanics. The minority women included 137 African Americans, 291 Asian Americans, and 97 Hispanics. Unfortunately, these numbers were so small, compared to the overall number of survey responses, that it was impossible to produce a meaningful analysis based on both individual racial categories and gender. Generally, African American and Hispanic women rated their firms lower in most categories than Asian American and white women. African American men tended to give their firms lower marks in more categories than white, Asian American, and Hispanic men. As a group, though, minority men seemed relatively content. Their responses tracked closely with those of both white men and women in questions relating to work. All three groups gave almost identical high marks to the quality of work assigned and its level of interest. Likewise, minority men, white men, and white women professed themselves satisfied with their work and said that they felt they were growing professionally at their firms. Minority men and white men found themselves in agreement in other key areas. Male midlevels of all races reported more client contact than women did. Men were more likely to say that they aspired to be like the partners in their firms and that they wanted to become partners themselves. Both minority and white men were more likely to recommend their firm to others, and they gave their firms higher marks overall. The male midlevels also thought they’d probably be at the same firm two years down the road, more so than their female counterparts did. “Men of color are learning what they need to do to take charge of their career, build networks, and get integrated into firms,” says diversity consultant Arin Reeves, president and founder of The Athens Group in Chicago. There are “more examples of men of color who are succeeding . . . as partners,” Reeves adds. “Now, when men of color reach out, white men will pull them in.” As a black male partner at one of The American Lawyer‘s A-List firms said in an interview: “Young men of color are feeling the love” from firms that are trying harder to improve their diversity. Minority women are feeling less love, judging from survey results. They gave firms lower marks than all other groups did in almost every category, including quality of work, interest level of work, satisfaction with work, and professional growth. White women gave somewhat similar answers on some issues, such as client contact; the importance of partnership; how much they aspired to be like the partners in their firm; whether they would recommend their firms to job hunters; how they rated their firm overall; and whether they would be at the firm in two years. Yet the responses from minority women were consistently more negative than those of white women. “It does seem that the combination of being a racial minority and being a woman creates a double layer of difference that’s a huge component in a midlevel attorney’s experience,” observes Marla Butler, an Atlanta-based black partner at Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi who serves on the firm’s diversity committee. In a few areas, the gap between minority female midlevels and other groups seemed like a chasm. Most dramatically, minority women rated their firm’s dedication to diversity more harshly than any other group, including minority men. When it came to assigning work, minority women thought the distribution of work less fair than white men did; white women and minority men were in the middle. Likewise, minority women felt that they had been given less responsibility than white men did. Not surprisingly, perhaps, 13.5 percent of minority female midlevels said they were actively seeking a new job, the highest percentage of any group. In written comments, many minority women complained that they felt at a disadvantage-”shut out,” as one Asian American third-year associate phrased it-in landing good work and opportunities for professional development. An African American third-year associate who shared this view noted that in her experience, “feedback is rare.” As a result, she wrote, “progress comes slowly or not at all. This leads to a feeling of powerlessness at a point when it seems too late to move on.” “Women of color don’t get the experience of their white male counterparts,” asserts Paulette Brown, an African American partner and chief diversity officer at Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge. An outspoken diversity advocate, Brown last year coauthored an American Bar Association report that found that minority female lawyers face more obstacles at big firms than their male minority peers. Big-firm partners tend to overlook and underestimate the abilities of minority women lawyers, Brown says: “Many of the people who still have control and power in law firms have had no relationships with women of color in any form other than their nannies or housekeepers.” Bearing out her argument, female minority midlevels gave firms the lowest rating on the relations between partners and associates. Robins Kaplan’s Butler, however, argues that minority women can push for change themselves. “They’ve got to get over the intimidation factor, and deliberately reach outside of their own comfort zones,” Butler says. “Take the risk that the person you’re reaching out to may have some discomfort. Just stay very aware of the social dynamics that are at issue, and resist the urge to take things personally.” Communications with partners seemed to be a more problematic area for both minority men and women. Midlevel associates from all groups agreed that they had plenty of opportunities to work with partners-but midlevels of color reported slightly fewer opportunities to socialize with partners. The minority associates surveyed also felt that evaluations were less fair than their white counterparts did. All midlevels-but especially midlevels of color-gave firms mediocre marks for not communicating clearly enough what it takes to make partner. Minority associates also felt less privy to firm financials. A male African American fourth-year associate summed up his views this way: “I would [appreciate] more disclosure from management about finances and strategies and a clearer understanding of what it takes to make partner.” And an Asian American male fourth-year concurred in his comments: “Management is secretive on all administrative issues, from partnership prospects to hiring decisions.” In questions dealing with work/life balance, responses from minority and white women were closely aligned. Both found their firms less family-friendly than men did. Asked if they were willing to accept a pay cut in exchange for a reduction in billable hours requirements, minority women were slightly less willing than white women to say yes. Compared with men, all women put a smaller premium on partnership, and they overwhelmingly favored alternative tracks to partnership. The lesson for firms? Our data suggests that firms have a great, untapped opportunity as they struggle to keep talented minority lawyers: By focusing more on retaining female associates of color, they may be able to reap some important gains. One of the biggest areas for improvement, according to our survey, lies with the assignment and evaluation system. If firms can ensure that female minority lawyers have access to the same high-quality work that their male peers do, and the same kind of informal, one-to-one feedback at the end of each assignment, they may go a long way toward eliminating one of the biggest causes of dissatisfaction among the minority women in their associate ranks. Addressing work/life balance issues will also help retain women of all races. Making more intangible changes, such as improving communications and relations between white partners and minority associates, is more difficult-but crucial to building diversity. That’s increasingly clear to white lawyers as well as minority lawyers, as one white female fourth-year associate noted in her comments. “In many cases [at my firm], female associates, associates of color, and gay associates are not treated as well as straight male associates,” she wrote. “This doesn’t seem intentional. It is just that the partners do not feel comfortable with associates who are unlike them . . . [and these] associates feel very marginalized. . . . The firm is probably wondering why it can’t keep female and minority associates-well, this is the answer.” E-mail: [email protected]. A version of this article appeared in Minority Law Journal Student Edition, a sibling publication of The American Lawyer. For more survey details, see minoritylawjournal.com.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.