Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
CHICAGO � Law firms once dreamed of owning separate businesses to bring in new streams of revenue, and while some achieved that goal, the industry is now largely backing away from a strategy that provided little economic benefit. While some firms still own the standalone affiliates that mainly came into being in the 1980s and 1990s, many are selling the entities and few new ones have popped up in recent years. San Francisco-based Littler Mendelson, the labor and employment firm, is in “preliminary discussions” to sell ELT Inc., an affiliate co-owned with a group of banks that provides online workplace compliance training, said Garry Mathiason, a partner at the firm who is also ELT’s chairman. Partners at the firm have been pleased with ELT and hope to keep selling legal content to it after it’s sold, but they don’t see business ownership “as a road to keep developing,” he said. “The mental elements that make law firms and lawyers incredibly successful are incredibly destructive to business,” Mathiason said. Lawyers “try to constantly work on eliminating risk and businesses build on ways of trying to assume risk.” Bingham McCutchen in June sold its biggest affiliate, the wealth management company Bingham Legg Advisers, to Wilmington Trust Corp. The law firm had owned a 50% stake in the eight-year-old joint venture with Legg Mason Inc. The firm sold the 30-employee Bingham Legg Advisers because its interests, and those of its partner, had changed and there was “a good opportunity to concentrate on the things that we really do best,” Chairman Jay Zimmerman said. The firm still has smaller consulting entities and doesn’t have plans to sell them, he said. A thin bottom line The affiliates just haven’t added much to the bottom line, said Jim Jones, an attorney and legal consultant at Hildebrandt International in Washington. “It’s never really proved to be a great bonanza for firms,” said Jones, who wrote the 2002 book Beyond Legal Practice: Organizing and Managing Ancillary Businesses. “Most firms have probably realized that these are tough entities to manage.” While Jones said he still gets inquiries from firms about affiliates several times a year, the calls are about restructuring or selling the units as often as they’re about starting one, he said. Holland & Knight owned about a half-dozen consulting-service affiliates until about 2003, but some lawyers were always uncomfortable with the idea, said Kinder Cannon, the firm’s general counsel. While owning them incurred no great costs, they didn’t provide much economic benefit either, he said. “There was this sense that we’re not doing what we do best, which is practicing law,” said Cannon, who is based in the firm’s Jacksonville, Fla., office. Since the collapse of Enron Corp. in 2001 and the related demise of Arthur Andersen, a consulting firm that once employed many lawyers, the pressure on law firms to compete by offering a variety of professional services has eased, Cannon said. Since then, there’s been zero interest to get back in, he said. “Now, we’ve kind of purged it from our minds,” he said. But not all firms are shedding their affiliates. Duane Morris has six affiliates with substantive operations, in addition to the lobbying unit, said the Philadelphia-based firm’s chairman, Sheldon Bonovitz. They include a family of three entities in Pennsylvania, Maryland and New Jersey that underwrite medical malpractice insurance for doctors and hospitals; DM Trust Co., a unit created this year to help immigrants to the United States transfer trust assets; the financial planning services unit Wescott Financial Advisory Group with about $1.5 billion under management; and Wescott Healthcare, which advises hospitals and other health care entities on financial and operational issues as well as revenue recovery. “The strategy is to keep them indefinitely to provide a revenue stream for the partnership,” Bonovitz said. The entities that aren’t in startup mode have been profitable and are growing, said Bonovitz, who declined to provide any financial statistics. The businesses may provide a lure for attorney recruits, but not because of financial reward, he said. The revenue is “significant, but small in relation to the total partner income,” Bonovitz said. “A person wouldn’t come to us because of the economic benefits of the ancillary businesses, but it’s attractive in that it reflects the personality of the firm,” he added.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.