Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
LOS ANGELES � Federal prosecutors in the criminal case against civil rights attorney Stephen Yagman are seeking a prison sentence of nine years, citing his “prolonged, sophisticated and calculated” behavior. Yagman, a partner at Venice Beach, Calif.-based Yagman & Yagman & Reichmann, was convicted this past summer of money laundering, tax evasion and bankruptcy fraud. He is scheduled to be sentenced on Nov. 5. His lawyer, Barry Tarlow, a partner at Los Angeles-based Tarlow & Berk, is asking for about two to four years. Both sentencing requests deviate substantially from the pre-sentencing report recommendation of nearly 5 1/2 years. Yagman was convicted of failing to pay $158,000 in federal income taxes to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). He also hid assets, such as a 2,800-square-foot house in Venice Beach, from creditors and trustees who were overseeing bankruptcies he filed on behalf of himself and his former firm, Yagman & Yagman. A jury convicted Yagman on 17 counts of money laundering, one count of tax evasion and one count of bankruptcy fraud. Later, U.S. District Judge Stephen Wilson of the Central District of California granted acquittals on six of the money laundering counts. According to court filings, a pre-sentencing report recommended Yagman serve 63 months in prison, plus two years of supervised release. An ‘elaborate scheme’ Prosecutors, however, have recommended a sentence of 103 months. Thom Mrozek, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California, declined to comment. Prosecutors say Yagman “constructed and carried out an elaborate scheme to break the law, harm his creditors, stiff the government, and get away with it,” according to court papers. Tarlow, who did not return calls, recommended a sentence of 27 to 46 months. He said Yagman’s crimes do not rise to the level of “sophisticated” concealment. Prosecutors could not prove that Yagman deliberately concealed assets in bank accounts; he disputed the government’s perjury claims. He also said the judge rejected claims that Yagman fabricated evidence.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.