X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
I don’t know about you, but there’s a part of the year where I get fed up with awards of all kinds-every winter I judge the National Magazine and American Business Media awards, and at the same time watch the Grammys and Academy Awards on TV. I find myself thinking of every part of daily life as if it’s an acceptance speech. What would someone say if they got an award for making the best sesame bagel in midtown? You get the picture. But there’s one awards process that I genuinely look forward to-our Best Legal Department contest. It’s not just because the gala honoring the winners is a swanky black-tie affair, and I don’t get out much. It’s more that I’ve been excited to see the contest have such an impact on in-house counsel around the country. Honestly, when I first conceived of the award a few years ago, I wasn’t sure whether any company would participate. And, if that law department did enter, whether it would answer enough questions so that we could make an informed decision. But my neuroses, for once, were wrong. This fall we’re beginning the process of figuring out the winner and runners-up for the 2008 Best Legal Department awards. We’re expanding the competition, so that all companies in the Fortune 1000 are allowed to enter. To participate, e-mail me at [email protected] , and we’ll send you a survey form. To see our coverage of the 2007 winners, click here. On another front, I’ve received several phone calls and e-mails over the last month about our new methodology for our Who Represents Corporate America survey in our September issue. The feedback I’ve gotten is that our decision to use public records to suss out the law firms-for IP, commercial litigation, corporate transactions, and labor and employment for the Fortune 250-is incomplete and unfair. Some of you have complained that the public records show only a smattering of the outside counsel that you use. Moreover, firms that keep you out of litigation, for example, never get mentioned, no matter how often you use them. These are all fair and excellent points. While we still have to work within the limits of public filings, next year we’ll look for ways to make our research more exhaustive.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.