Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
It’s common for parties to a Supreme Court decision to debate who really won and who really lost. Maybe the short-term consequences are bad for one industry, but the long-term consequences are good. In the case of KSR v. Teleflex, the effects of the Court’s ruling on obviousness will ripple through the patent community for years to come. Robert Sterne and Kenneth Bass III have thought quite a bit about those effects because they served as co-counsel for Teleflex in the Supreme Court dispute. In “ Obviously Wise?“, they come up with a dozen each of winners and losers post- KSR. One of India’s great success stories is its movie industry. And yet the numbers for Bollywood tell a bittersweet tale: great popularity at home, enormous growth potential abroad, and substantial money draining off into the pockets of the copyright pirates. What’s a filmmaker to do? In “ A Picture Is Worth . . .“, Bertrand Moullier and Michael Ryan say that Bollywood is looking for answers in one of India’s other success stories: its thriving community of information technology experts. Closer to home, the patent bar breathlessly awaits word from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on the tricky business of willfulness, again. Accused patent infringers often use opinions of counsel to show that they didn’t intend to infringe. Three years ago, the Federal Circuit said that jurors can’t draw an adverse inference when a defendant chooses not to reveal that opinion of counsel. (Score one for the accused infringers.) Last year, the court said accused infringers may not waive the privilege just for favorable opinions. (Score one of the patentees.) And now the court is mulling whether accused infringers should be allowed to selectively waive the privilege for communications about willfulness from opinion counsel but not from trial counsel. (Score one for . . . ?) In “ Close the Seagate,” Timothy Teter weighs in with his own advice for the court. — Elizabeth Engdahl Managing Editor

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.