X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The trial of a former Network Associates Inc. executive that began Thursday morning really does present some compelling issues. You just might not realize it in the courtroom. As with many corporate fraud cases, the prosecution of Prabhat Goyal � the ex-CFO of Network Associates, now known as McAfee � hinges on arcane questions of accounting practices and cash flow. But beneath its rather dry surface, the Goyal case presents a drama that few expected when Goyal was indicted in 2004: A central figure in the case, former McAfee controller Terry Davis, has become a key player in the government’s subsequent indictment of McAfee’s ex-general counsel, Kent Roberts, in connection with misdating stock options. Roberts is the first Silicon Valley general counsel charged in the stock options backdating scandal. His case is being closely watched by prosecutors and defense lawyers hoping to get a sense of how dozens of other options investigations might play out. If Davis testifies in Goyal’s case, it would give the Roberts defense team sworn testimony by a key witness, a potentially valuable tool in defending him. Davis was the Network Associates controller in 1999 and 2000 when Goyal is alleged to have artificially pumped up the company’s revenue by manipulating distribution deals and accounting practices to meet quarterly profit expectations. “The defendant had a role in this, and the defendant personally approved the terms and conditions of each of those deals,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian Stretch told the jury in his opening statement Thursday. Goyal’s lawyer, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr partner Stephen Jonas, disagreed. “He was honest, ethical, and did nothing wrong,” Jonas told the jury. Indeed, he said, at a company where then-CEO William Larson pressured his team to keep sales strong, Goyal provided balance.
Optional Reading

Read The Recorder‘s roundup of the stock-option backdating scandal. There won’t be a test later … but there might be a subpoena.

“Prabhat was the guy who was the sort of yin to Mr. Larson’s yang,” Jonas said, adding that Goyal was the person saying “‘let’s make sure that this is done on the straight and narrow.’” Davis, on the other hand, acknowledged that his conduct at McAfee followed neither the straight nor the narrow when he pleaded guilty in 2003 to securities fraud and agreed to cooperate against his old boss. It’s unlikely that prosecutors back then foresaw the side benefit of Davis’ cooperation: He’s now a key witness in the options backdating case against Roberts. In fact, the Roberts indictment claims Davis was the scapegoat in Roberts’ scheme to cover up his own options misbehavior. The February indictment said the former GC asked Davis to alter the date on an options grant in 2000. Prosecutors contend that, after McAfee’s accounting problems led Goyal and other top executives to leave in 2000, McAfee started an “ethics first committee” � and put Roberts in charge � to investigate internal whistle-blower complaints. When someone told the committee that Davis was involved in accounting improprieties, including options problems, the indictment says, Roberts investigated � but in doing so, he failed to mention that he had directed Davis to backdate his own grant. “As a result of the investigation, Roberts recommended, and Network Associates’ management agreed, to remove the then-controller from his position in the finance department,” the Roberts indictment says. A lawyer for Roberts, Cooley Godward Kronish partner Neal Stephens, said in a Thursday voicemail that he couldn’t comment because he was in meetings all afternoon. And Thomas Nolan, the Nolan, Armstrong & Barton partner representing Davis, didn’t return a call by press time. But lawyers in the Roberts case will be listening closely if Davis takes the stand. And that remains an “if.” While Stretch did mention Davis in his opening statement, Jonas signaled that he’d push hard to question witness’ credibility by saying that government witnesses had been interviewed multiple times. “They’re going to bring you witnesses who are felons,” he told the jury.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.