With dozens of labor lawyers packing the courtroom Tuesday, the California Supreme Court strongly indicated it had no intention of exposing employers to potentially millions of dollars more in workers' compensation payments. At issue in two companion cases Tuesday was 2004 legislation that rewrote the method for apportioning percentages of injury when calculating how much workers' comp money an employee should receive for permanent disabilities.
April 05, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
With dozens of labor lawyers packing the courtroom Tuesday, the California Supreme Court strongly indicated it had no intention of exposing employers to potentially millions of dollars more in workers’ compensation payments.
At issue in two companion cases Tuesday was 2004 legislation that rewrote the method for apportioning percentages of injury when calculating how much workers’ comp money an employee should receive for permanent disabilities.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
