By filing hundreds of lawsuits against businesses that fail to accommodate the disabled, some say Jarek Molski went too far. But the self-styled civil rights activist found a friendlier audience at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

A few years ago, a jury came down against Molski in a disability-access trial despite the fact that, at least in the 9th Circuit’s eyes, he had undisputed evidence on his side. A district judge should have known better than to let that verdict stand, the unanimous panel concluded Friday.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]