Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Lawyers for Banc of America Securities LLC presented e-mail evidence in a New York federal court Friday that they say shows that Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman knowingly used privileged documents in order to bring a case against several hedge funds on behalf of Biovail Pharmaceuticals, a drugmaker. Gary Svirsky, a partner at O’Melveny & Myers who represents B of A, asked Judge Richard Owen to disqualify Kasowitz, Benson as counsel in the case. Svirsky also asked the judge to order Kasowitz, Benson to pay B of A’s attorneys’ fees. Biovail is the defendant in a shareholder lawsuit in New York and the plaintiff in a New Jersey lawsuit against several hedge funds and analysts who cover the pharmaceutical industry. Some of the analysts are employed by B of A. At issue in both suits is whether the hedge funds and analysts colluded in a scheme to bring Biovail’s stock price down and short its stock. In an earlier hearing, name partner Marc Kasowitz testified that he didn’t know the documents were sealed until January 2007. The e-mails presented by B of A on Friday show that a Kasowitz attorney asked for — and received — a copy of the protective order on March 7, 2006, two days before Biovail served the complaint against the hedge defendants. “Far from taking measures to comply with the protective order,” Svirsky of O’Melveny wrote in a letter to the court yesterday, “the Kasowitz firm appears to have been working aggressively to violate it.” B of A is not a party to either suit. Banc of America Securities, the investment banking arm of Bank of America Corporation, provided documents to Biovail in the shareholder derivative suit, on the condition that the documents would not be used in any other litigation. Kasowitz declined to comment. In Friday’s proceedings, however, John Siffert of Lankler Siffert & Wohl, an attorney for Kasowitz, said the incident was a simple misunderstanding. He said that the protective order had been communicated to one junior associate at the firm, who didn’t alert his superiors. “To suggest willful disregard for the judge’s order is wrong,” he said. The use of the documents has been the subject of a long-running dispute. B of A complained to New York judge Richard Owen about the breach of the protective order as early as last summer. In a previous hearing, Judge Owen ordered that the privileged material be culled form the hedge fund complaint, and ordered Biovail to pay B of A’s attorneys’ fees. The hearing is scheduled to continue Tuesday.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.