Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Attorney Brad Seligman was on a hunt to find out whatever he could about Wal-Mart Stores Inc. after hearing about a potential claim of alleged sex discrimination against the retailer in 1999. “I called up my friend, another attorney, and he immediately said, ‘evil empire,’ ” said Seligman, executive director and founder of a nonprofit group called Impact Litigation Fund, located in Berkeley, Calif. “ Then I called another friend, who is an economist, and he also indicated the same.” Based on the advice of his friends and some statistical research of his own, the litigation began. On Feb. 6, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court decision making the case the largest employment discrimination class action to go to trial. Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., No. 3:01-CV-02252 (N.D. -Calif.). The Impact Fund filed the lawsuit against Wal-Mart. The organization aims to provide funding, training and advice to lawyers who want to bring public interest impact lawsuits in civil rights, poverty and environmental justice. And its Equal Justice Litigation Program works as co-counsel on select cases, including the Wal-Mart case. The Impact Fund has three attorneys: Seligman, Jocelyn Larkin and Julia Campins. The entire organization runs with 12 employees, said Larkin, and their workspace is a typical nonprofit office, full of “hand-me-down furniture.” But their work, as the organization’s name suggests, is anything but little. They are currently involved in litigating six cases, including another gender discrimination class action against Costco stores. Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 3:04-CV-03341 (N.D. Calif.). Wal-Mart will appeal the decision, said Theodore J. Boutrous, the company’s chief counsel on appeal and a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher in Los Angeles. “We feel we have excellent arguments for en banc review in the 9th Circuit and to the Supreme Court,” Boutrous said, arguing that this ruling conflicts with class action certification laws in other jurisdictions. “We do not feel it is fair for the plaintiffs to act that the court has made a decision on the merits,” he said. “This ruling does not speak to the merits of the plaintiffs’ claim.” A life change Seligman founded Impact Fund after working 11 years as a plaintiffs’ class -action lawyer in a small Oakland, Calif., firm Saperstein, Seligman, Mayeda & Larkin. He became managing partner of the firm, and he then realized his career was becoming too demanding. “I was 40 and I was a single parent, and I realized it just wouldn’t be as much fun for me, so I resigned,” he said. “Then I realized I made more money than I planned to make and I wanted to find a way to give it away.” He thought of creating a fund where he could give out grants to attorneys who have clients and cases, but do not have enough money to go through litigation. He quickly learned that it wasn’t just money that other attorneys sought. They also wanted to learn from his experience and expertise as a class action attorney. “I started to spend much more time talking to people than giving away money,” Seligman said. And so he started a training program and working as co-counsel on certain cases. Seligman became interested in Wal-Mart when Stephen Tinkler, now an attorney with Tinkler & Firth in Santa Fe, N.M., called him for information on how he should best carry out a gender discrimination class action against the retailer. Seligman’s idea was to put together a unique team made up of a mix of nonprofit organizations and private firms to represent the class against Wal-Mart. The nonprofit groups, in addition to the Impact Fund, are the Equal Rights Advocates in San Francisco, which specializes in sex discrimination cases, and the Public Justice Center, a Baltimore nonprofit firm. The firms are Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll in Washington; Davis Cowell & Bowe in San Francisco; and Tinkler & Firth and Merit Bennett in Santa Fe. Together, 18 attorneys worked through discovery, Seligman said. Irma Herrera, executive director of the Equal Rights Advocates, said the attorneys reviewed more than one million documents. “We were criss-crossing the country taking depositions of Wal-Mart employers and preparing the employees,” she said.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.