Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The early days of the associate-salary war resembled the frenetic call-and-response often found at a D.C. go-go concert. (Hogan, let me hear you!). And so, too, did the heavy rhythm and drumming coming from District firms wanting to be seen and heard rising to a challenge to prove they have muscle in the market. But in the second week after Hogan & Hartson and O’Melveny & Myers established a $145,000 target for paying first-years, the audible response waned. But only briefly. Then, in a Friday afternoon cacophony, several firms, such as Arnold & Porter; Latham & Watkins; Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; and Sidley Austin, shattered the deafening silence. For most of last week, California-based Latham and Gibson (which last year was one of the first firms to raise salaries) had been hunkered down in a Cold War-era game of Mutual Assured Destruction, waiting for the other to launch first. Then on Friday Latham struck, hiking starting salaries up to $145,000. Within minutes, Gibson matched; just a couple of ICBMs passing in the sky. Several D.C.-based firms, including WilmerHale, Covington & Burling, Steptoe & Johnson, Patton Boggs, and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, also bumped pay, all matching the first-year number of $145,000. What’s driving the action — and, conversely, the inaction — depends on the “market,” which firms define as a confluence of practice, city, and competitor pay. For instance, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner (which has yet to move its first-years’ salary from $135,000) is certainly keeping an eye on what everyone is doing, but most important in their worldview is what other IP firms are paying, putting Fish & Richardson’s raise to $160,000 squarely on their radar. Of course, the major firms who haven’t moved are becoming more conspicuous: Dickstein Shapiro, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, Wiley Rein, Crowell & Moring, and Howrey. All are local powers and stalwarts on the Legal Times D.C. 20. Dickstein Chairman Michael Nannes says he’s confident the firm will change its starting number to $145,000 and make it retroactive. And rest assured that it’ll be done with all the attendant clamor.
Nathan Carlile can be contacted at [email protected].

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.