Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Documents Reveal New Details On Ney Activities Court documents filed last week in the corruption prosecution of former Rep. Bob Ney offer new details about the Ohio Republican’s illicit activities — and suggest that Ney was aided in those dealings by a key staffer. • Staying Put: Mendelson Retains Post in New D.C. Government While change rolls through the D.C. government at least one veteran said last week he will keep his post. D.C. Council member Phil Mendelson (D-At-large) retained his chairmanship of the Judiciary Committee, although its name grew a bit longer to become the Public Safety and the Judiciary Committee. • FEMA Fetish: Judge Leon Continues Oversight of FEMA When a judge issues an order, it’s usually up to the winning party to tell the court if its wishes are not being fulfilled. But Judge Richard Leon is taking no chances when it comes to the Federal Emergency Management Agency • Name Dropping: Who Will Replace Harriet Miers? Harriet Miers was hardly a household name when she was chosen as the White House’s top lawyer in 2004. Though Republican lawyers are uncertain who President George W. Bush will name to replace her when she steps down at the end of the month, they are certain it will be a Republican litigator familiar with the politics of Washington. • Orrick, Dewey Call Off Deal New York’s Dewey Ballantine and San Francisco’s Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe announced last week that they have called off their merger discussions. • Not Good Enough: McNulty’s Memo Criticized Corporations and civil libertarians hailed the “McNulty memo” as a major victory in preserving attorney-client privilege. But now those groups say the December memo, named after Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty, did not do enough. • Leaving the Lab: DEA Chemists Coming to Court as Expert Witnesses Drug Enforcement Administration chemists will be trekking from their lab in Largo, Md., to D.C. Superior Court more often after a Dec. 28 ruling by the D.C. Court of Appeals, which found that a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses doesn’t exclude expert witnesses such as chemists.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.