X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
SAN FRANCISCO-A few California district attorneys are mad as hell at the press and they’re not going to take it anymore. Critical media coverage has prompted local district attorneys in San Jose, Bakersfield and Orange County, as well as a city attorney in San Diego, to take on local newspaper criticism by posting responses on the Internet through county Web pages and, in the case of San Diego, regular blog postings. It signals new media savvy among the prosecutors, but it also raises the potential risk of tainting the process by crossing ethical lines that might prejudice an active case, waive work-product privileges or lock prosecutors into a strategy before the case fully develops, warned Laurie Levenson, a former prosecutor and now a professor at Loyola Law School, Los Angeles. “They are just raising the stakes by taking on the paper through a Web page. Mark Twain was right-’Don’t fight people who buy ink by the barrel,’ ” Levenson said. “ I love the fact the public remains more informed about what is going on in a prosecutor’s office, but the question remains: How carefully monitored is it, and does it impact the right to a fair trial?” Battle in Bakersfield Those worries don’t deter the most aggressive of the media critics, Kern County District Attorney Edward Jagels from the conservative Central Valley region around Bakersfield. He launched what he promised to be a weekly column on the county government’s Web page called “Every Lie They Print,” taking on the Bakersfield Californian‘s crime reporting. Jagels was particularly upset by reporting of the appellate reversal of a murder conviction based on a prosecutor withholding from the defense negative details about an informant in the case. Jagels said that if the honesty and integrity of police and the district attorney’s office is “maligned through innuendo and scandal mongering, it is essential that I comment.” The paper has written about Jagels’ Web site and pointed readers to it from the Californian‘s Web site. There are mixed feelings about it in the newsroom, according to Assistant Managing Editor Lois Henry. “There are people here who feel this is a breathless abuse of power by a very, very powerful man . . . .Others in the newsroom think it is an interesting exchange that we would not be able to do without the technology,” Henry said. In Santa Clara County, retiring District Attorney George Kennedy posted statements in August and October on the county Web page accusing the San Jose Mercury News of distorting the record in an investigative series that alleged “questionable conduct” in criminal prosecutions it reviewed. “I thought there should be some place in the public record a refutation of things that are really false,” Kennedy said. “I’m hoping when people do Web research years off in the future and they find this [series], they will find my page also. It goes to making a more complete record,” he said. Bert Robinson, Mercury News assistant managing editor, said that Kennedy had space to respond in an opinion page to readers of the series. “I don’t have a problem with him doing something in addition to that,” Robinson said. “We think it’s wonderful people can get their point of view out.” But Robinson added, “I hope public officials don’t get to the point they substitute the Web page for interacting with the press.” That may be what is evolving in San Diego, where City Attorney Michael Aguirre maintains a blog on the city’s Web page to expound on the city’s financial problems from underfunding of city pensions to bond debt spent for upgrading the football stadium. Aguirre critiques the San Diego Union-Tribune‘s coverage as well, and in an Oct. 13 posting responded to political criticism from the last election. In Orange County, the media affairs officer for District Attorney Tony Rackauckas took on a Los Angeles Times reporter who covers the county. Susan Kang Schroeder criticized the reporter’s ethics and warned others in an agencywide e-mail to use “extreme caution” in dealing with her. The e-mails surfaced in a competing local paper. Internet criticism in 2003-04 by Rackauckas’ office and temporarily refusing to return calls to Times reporters didn’t improve matters. Times Orange County editor Steve Marble called the September e-mail a “shocking personal attack” on a reporter and full of misstatements in one media account.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.