Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The American Bar Association last week issued a policy statement objecting to the Department of Justice policy of urging companies under criminal investigation to cut off the payment of legal fees to their employees. It is the second time in a year that the ABA has attacked the so-called Thompson memo, which outlines strategies the DOJ uses to compel companies to cooperate with investigations. The fact that the ABA approved the statement unanimously at its annual conference in Hawaii indicates the “concern of the organized bar with the manner in which the Thompson memo has been carried out,” says Jan Handzlik, a partner with Howrey’s Los Angeles office and a member of the ABA task force that drafted the recommendations. The ABA’s criticism comes on the heels of a June 27 ruling, in the case of former KPMG employees by Judge Lewis Kaplan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, that the guidelines in the Thompson memo that state that prosecutors can interpret a company’s willingness to advance legal fees as a sign of lack of cooperation violated employees’ Fifth Amendment right to a fair trial and Sixth Amendment right to legal representation. “You’d think DOJ can’t stick its head in the sand anymore” now that an organization as large as the ABA has come out against these practices, says Stephanie Martz, director of the White Collar Crime Project at the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and a liaison to the task force. Kathleen Blomquist, a DOJ spokeswoman, says the department remains committed to the principles in the Thompson memo but would continue to listen to groups’ concerns about DOJ policies. She adds, “The government does not force corporations to do anything that it is not in their business interest to do.” Interestingly, Larry Thompson, who served as deputy attorney general when the DOJ overhauled its guidelines for corporate prosecutions, is also a member of the ABA’s task force, although other task force members say he hasn’t participated in the discussions on the issue.
Alexia Garamfalvi can be contacted at [email protected].

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.