Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Arnold & Porter hosted a mayoral debate — an invitation-only affair closed to the public — on June 29. And beyond a few fireworks offered by partner Stephen Porter, the senior member of the firm’s real estate practice, it’s arguable that it never really got going. The lightest moment came early, when moderator Mark Plotkin, a political commentator and analyst for radio station WTOP, asked candidates Adrian Fenty and Vincent Orange the name of Arnold & Porter’s managing partner. Neither knew it. (The answer: Richard Alexander.) Plotkin, who spoke before about 100 firm attorneys and clients, asked a variety of questions, which were answered semantically by most of the five major Democratic candidates — except for Fenty, who had an affinity for directness. The hourlong discussion’s best moment came when Porter complained that Fenty dodged his question. Porter had asked why Fenty has pledged never to raise taxes as mayor, when he supported an increase in the recordation tax as a D.C. council member. Fenty responded that he wouldn’t have to raise taxes as mayor because the city would have more than enough income — if dollars were managed better. Porter shook his head and raised his arm, appealing to the moderator for intervention. None came. Council Chairwoman Linda Cropp, at this point Fenty’s chief rival, said, “Things have improved, but there’s still a lot to be done,” and pointed to affordable housing and education as her two biggest concerns. When the quintet was asked what the city’s legal community could do better to help the District, Michael Brown, managing partner at lobby firm Alcalde & Fay, said the town’s considerable lobbying and legal skills must be wielded for it to attain statehood — a goal agreed upon by all the candidates. He also added, “D.C.’s judges on the Superior Court should be elected.” Marie Johns, the former president and CEO of Verizon D.C., spoke about AIDS and compared the city’s blight with that of a third-world country. In total, there was more agreement than disagreement, though the candidates, sitting inches apart, did not interact warmly. After 40 similar debates and with the primary election still more than two months away, that was to be expected.
Nathan Carlile can be contacted at [email protected].

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.