Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The Illinois Supreme Court will not reconsider its decision to throw out a $10 billion verdict against cigarette manufacturer Philip Morris USA, issuing an order Friday that denied a request for rehearing the case. The court ruled 4-2 in December that the verdict handed down by a Madison County court was invalid and ordered that lower court to dismiss the case. The state high court said the Federal Trade Commission allowed companies to characterize their cigarettes as “light” and “low tar,” so Philip Morris did not improperly mislead customers about the health impacts of its cigarettes. The court did not comment on why it refused to reconsider the case, but two justices strongly disagreed. Justices Charles Freeman and Thomas Kilbride said the rest of the court overlooked or misunderstood significant questions raised by plaintiffs seeking reconsideration. They said the court seemed more concerned with ending the case than making the most informed decision. “The court’s denial of the petition for rehearing does not speak well of the court,” Freeman wrote in a 14-page dissent. “It is disappointing, and will ultimately prove to be embarrassing. History will be the judge.” The tobacco company, a unit of Altria Group Inc., argues the case should never have been declared a class action on behalf of some 1.1 million people who bought light cigarettes in Illinois. The smokers did not accuse the company of harming their health. They claimed Philip Morris knew when it introduced light cigarettes in 1971 that they were no healthier than regular cigarettes, but it hid that information and the fact that light cigarettes actually had a more toxic form of tar. Madison County Judge Nicholas Byron agreed that Philip Morris misled customers into believing they were buying a less harmful cigarette. In March 2003, he ordered the company to pay $10.1 billion — $5 billion in compensatory damages, $3 billion in punitive damages and $2.1 billion in interest. Philip Morris appealed directly to the state Supreme Court two years ago, arguing the trial court’s decision was flawed in several ways. It insisted its cigarettes performed as advertised. Those advertisements met federal guidelines and never promised light cigarettes were less hazardous than other cigarettes, the company said. Copyright 2006 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.