Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The split verdict in the first trial of a pair of long-term Vioxx users’ cases against Merck & Co. would support its strategy of battling each claim rather than settling the more than 10,000 cases, litigators say. Although an Atlantic City, N.J., jury said that the Whitehouse Station, N.J., pharmaceutical giant failed to adequately warn John McDarby, 77, and Thomas Cona, 60, of the heart risk factors of taking Vioxx, it awarded $13.5 million to McDarby and sent Cona home with only the $45 he had paid for the product. Both were long-term users of the drug. The latest results bring the trial tally to two wins apiece. Peter A. Bicks, a products liability litigator in the New York office of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe who is not involved in Vioxx litigation, said that “Merck’s clearly going to keep taking these cases into the courtroom.” The length of the recent jury’s deliberations in the punitive damages phase and the public comments that jurors made afterward suggest that “the case was close and winnable for Merck,” Bicks said. “Most juries would have been in and out of there in a couple hours. [This jury] deliberated for a day and a half over less than a day’s worth of evidence and a very straightforward question to be resolved, after they already had deliberated on liability for some time,” he said. “If Merck tightens up its jury selection method and trial strategy, it can and should be able to win most of the cases, in my view,” Bicks said. He added that it also remains to be seen what the conservative Texas appellate courts will do with Houston plaintiffs’ lawyer W. Mark Lanier’s blockbuster $253.4 million win last August-the first Vioxx verdict, reduced by state caps to $26 million. John F. Brenner, a partner at McCarter & English in Newark, N.J., who defended Novartis Consumer Health Inc. in phenylpropanolamine litigation, said that “Merck could have hoped for a happier result, but I would be surprised if it changes its overall strategy.” Brenner said that he expects that Merck is looking to see how numerous appellate issues will work out in New Jersey, where at least 5,000 cases are pending. He also agrees with Bicks that the cases are close. “Merck has a good story to tell and it already has convinced jurors. I don’t think this verdict will modify that, or that it really should modify that,” Brenner said. Nothing to cheer about But Bryan O. Blevins, a national asbestos plaintiffs’ litigator at Provost & Umphrey in Beaumont, Texas, said that plaintiffs beginning with two wins out of four doesn’t give Merck, its shareholders or insurers “anything to cheer about. “The verdict value of one win is substantially greater than negotiating the settlement of 10 cases at arm’s length,” Blevins said, pointing out that Merck takes a hit on the stock market with each plaintiffs’ verdict. “No one expects Merck to roll over,” Blevins said, but at some point, it will make an educated decision on whether to start resolving cases or to pay a substantial amount to defense firms to represent it. Merck remains committed to addressing Vioxx cases one by one over the coming years, according to spokeswoman Casey Stavropoulos. “The recent split decision in New Jersey and our previous victories in federal court and New Jersey, reaffirms our strategy of defending the litigation on a case-by-case basis,” she said.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.