The evidence shows that it was possible to interact via e-mail with the site, that physicians could register for continuing medical education on the site and that individuals could apply online for jobs. The evidence does not indicate that doctors interacted on patient care online. This level of connectivity does not rise to the level or purpose of interaction that would justify finding that the appellant had submitted himself to the jurisdiction of Texas courts.
March 13, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Borteck & Czapek, P.C., based in Florham Park, is a boutique estates and trusts law firm specializing in estate planning and administrat...
Gwinnett County State Court is seeking an attorney to assist the Judge by conducting a variety of legal research, analysis, and document pre...
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
