A Democratic Party official reviewed the filing of Jim Sharp, a candidate for the 1st Court of Appeals, and told him the application was in order. Later the party refused to certify his candidacy because his application had not been notarized."Because Sharp could have remedied this defect had the Party pointed it out rather than overlooked it, we hold that he is entitled to an opportunity to cure and, if he does, a place on the primary ballot.
February 06, 2006 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
Where the region's top lawyers, law firms and in-house teams will gather to celebrate their most stellar achievements of the year.
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
Consulting magazine is proud to recognize this unique group of movers & shakers at our annual Rising Stars of Profession awards.
Duane Morris LLP has an opening in its Houston office for a corporate associate to join its growing practice. The ideal candidate will hav...
Gill & Chamas, LLC is seeking a Personal Injury Attorney with 1-5+ years of experience. Opportunity to work with a Partner on pretrial a...
Large, multi-state defense firm seeks New Jersey admitted insurance defense attorney with portable case portfolio for a Senior Associate or ...
Aaronson Rappaport Feinstein & Deutsch, LLP mourns the loss of cofounder and original Managing Partner, Mark B. Feinstein.
Lawyers of Distinction would like to announce...
Snyder Sarno D'Aniello Maceri & daCosta would like to announce that...
