A key argument in a trade secrets lawsuit pertaining to the validity of a preliminary injunction has been denied, setting the stage for contempt hearings against two lawyers involved.
Attorneys on both sides of Jasmine Networks v. Marvell Semiconductor have been butting heads over the use of a voicemail message recording ever since the California Supreme Court decided to review the case in 2004.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
