A Pennsylvania federal judge was wrong to strike down federal obscenity laws as unconstitutional, the 3rd Circuit has ruled, because he improperly reasoned that a recent gay rights decision from the U.S. Supreme Court now shows that the laws violate fundamental rights to privacy. Instead, the circuit said, the lower court should have left it up to the justices to decide if their recent decisions concerning individual privacy rights in the bedroom undermine the Court's obscenity rulings.
December 12, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Where the region's top lawyers, law firms and in-house teams will gather to celebrate their most stellar achievements of the year.
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
Looking for an Associate Attorney with 2 to 5 years experience to handle Labor and Employment Law, Pension Appeals and Workers Compensation....
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Regional mid-sized firm with diverse civil litigation practice seeking hardworking and dedicated attorneys with 1-5 years experience for it...
Lawyers of Distinction would like to announce...
Snyder Sarno D'Aniello Maceri & daCosta would like to announce that...
COLE SCHOTZ P.C. WELCOME HONORABLE GARRY S. ROTHSTADT, J.A.D. (RET.)
