Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
MIAMI, Florida � With the stroke of a pen, President George W. Bush transformed alleged terrorist Jose Padilla from an enemy combatant with few legal rights to a criminal defendant protected by the Bill of Rights. The flip-flop that suddenly granted Mr. Padilla a host of rights that he had been denied for more than three years comes after the Bush administration fought bitterly to detain Mr. Padilla, a U.S. citizen, and deny him access to federal courts, his attorneys and the media. Yesterday, Mr. Padilla became a defendant in a federal criminal case in Miami, accused of conspiring to commit murder, kidnapping and other acts of terrorism abroad. At a news conference in Washington, D.C., Attorney General Alberto Gonzales refused to discuss Mr. Padilla’s previous detention. “The president was authorized to detain Mr. Padilla as an enemy combatant. I will leave it at that,” Mr. Gonzales told reporters. Legal critics contend the change is an indication the Bush administration knew it abused its discretion and retreated in an effort to preserve its ability to designate future enemy combatants, as Mr. Padilla’s case was poised for review by the U.S. Supreme Court. “Today’s move is an attempt to take this action away from the Supreme Court so that they can continue to exercise these powers, maybe not against Padilla but against other Americans in the next few years,” said Timothy Lynch, director of the Cato Institute’s Project on Criminal Justice. Mr. Padilla’s attorneys echoed that assessment. “This is a vindication of the entire constitutional process, finally giving him his day in court,” said Andrew Patel, a New York attorney who represents Mr. Padilla. “Most people don’t have to wait 3 1/2 years in jail in solitary confinement to get their right to a trial.” As an enemy combatant, Mr. Padilla had been denied the rights afforded criminal defendants, including the right to a speedy trial. The government had previously contended it could detain him indefinitely, as it has with hundreds of Middle Eastern men and boys detained at Camp X-ray in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Mr. Padilla, a former Broward County, Florida, resident, had been held in a U.S. Navy brig in South Carolina without charge since his arrest in 2002 for allegedly plotting to detonate a radioactive bomb in the U.S. But the indictment unsealed yesterday did not refer to a plan to detonate any radioactive device. He was instead charged with conspiracy to murder, maim or kidnap U.S. nationals overseas. Interim U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta of Miami stood at Mr. Gonzales’ side at the announcement of the indictment and transfer of Mr. Padilla to the Federal Detention Facility in downtown Miami. A notice of release from the military said Mr. Padilla is now in the custody of warden Loren Grayer. The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke. Mr. Acosta’s office declined to comment on the sudden change of course in the Mr. Padilla case. Mr. Padilla and four others were charged with various terrorist-related activities in the 11-count indictment. On Sunday, the president issued the order transferring Mr. Padilla out of military custody and into the hands of the Justice Department. “I hereby determine that it is in the interest of the United States that Jose Padilla be released from detention by the Secretary of Defense and transferred to the control of the Attorney General for the purpose of criminal proceedings against him” the presidential order declared. Supreme Court Factor “Legally it’s unprecedented; it’s never happened,” terrorism expert William Banks said of Mr. Padilla’s change in status. Mr. Banks is the director of the Institute for National Security and Terrorism at Syracuse University. Experts say the government may have moved to indict Mr. Padilla and change his status to avoid losing before the U.S. Supreme Court. “[The government] saw this case moving to the Supreme Court and, in my view, they came to the conclusion that the Supreme Court was going to reject this theory and say that these powers the president was asserting are illegal and violate the bill of rights,” said Mr. Lynch of the Cato Institute. Mr. Banks voiced a similar characterization of the president’s order. “I think it was the government not wanting to have to endure a Supreme Court battle over what due process rights [Padilla] would have been entitled to or whether they had the authority to detain him in a military setting at all,” Mr. Banks said. “They were looking at a loss in the Supreme Court, so they cut losses and now are looking to obtain a criminal conviction.” Experts also wondered why the government waited so long to indict Mr. Padilla if it was in a position to make a case against him. “I am cynical, frankly, as to whether this government has all of a sudden found religion or whether it is an accommodation to political reality,” said Lawrence Goldman, past president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. He criticized the Bush administration for holding Mr. Padilla on “hearsay, secret, unprovable evidence, with out charges, without access to lawyers, [and] without access to courts. He may be a very unpopular person � certainly that’s his image � but it shouldn’t happen to any of us.” What remains to be seen is if this latest move prevents the case from being reviewed by the Supreme Court. The Court could drop the case now that Mr. Padilla’s status has been changed, effectively rendering the issues in the case moot. But Mr. Lynch said it is possible the Court will rule in the case. The government’s move today, Mr. Lynch said, “might be perceived by the Court as a high-handed tactic by the Department of Justice to forestall judicial review.” Mr. Padilla filed a writ of certiorari seeking his release from the military prison to the U.S. Supreme Court in October. The Court took up the case and reply briefs were due from the government next week. Terrorism Charges The indictment adds Mr. Padilla and Kassem Daher, a Canadian citizen believed to be overseas, to a list of three other men already accused of assisting overseas terrorist groups and plotting to “murder, maim, and kidnap” people overseas. The indictment alleges Mr. Padilla was recruited by Islamic fundamentalist cells operating in North America. The co-conspirators named in the indictment include a Sunrise computer programmer, originally from Palestine, named Adham Amin Hassoun. Mr. Padilla had already been an unindicted co-conspirator in the Hassoun case. Mr. Hassoun is accused of providing materials, money and manpower to overseas terrorist cells. Mr. Hassoun, who attended the same Fort Lauderdale mosque as Mr. Padilla, has been in jail awaiting trial since June 2002 and previous indictments against him have been amended several times, beginning with a simply possession of a firearm charge. Mr. Hassoun had been ordered deported in a secret proceeding before a federal judge in Miami, the Daily Business Review first reported in 2003. The judge reportedly made his decision based on a lengthy FBI report about Mr. Hassoun’s activities, which was also sealed at the time. Much of the evidence in the case remained sealed when Mr. Hassoun finally made his first court appearance in 2004. The new indictment claims Mr. Padilla went overseas to train for future terrorist operations with other Islamic radicals. Mr. Padilla and his co-defendants could be sentenced to life if convicted. � Carl Jones is a reporter for the Daily Business Review, a Miami affiliate of the New York Law Journal. Mr. Jones can be reached at [email protected] .

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.