"[C]ollateral estoppel barred the issue of Roosevelt's biological paternity from being relitigated in this suit because: 1. Roosevelt's biological paternity was litigated in a prior suit; 2. the issue of Roosevelt's paternity was essential to the 1998 judgment; and 3. the same parties were cast as adversaries in the first suit."
November 07, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania with their dedication to law.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
We are seeking a lawyer with extensive transactional intellectual property experience to join our corporate practice. Candidates shoul...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking an associate to join our corporate and transactional practice in our DC, Stamford, Hartford or New...
Our client, a successful real investment company, is seeking to hire a Tax Controversy Counsel for their expanding operation. The ideal...
MARTIN, CLEARWATER & BELL LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW IN MEMORY OF FRANCIS PETER BENSEL
GILL & CHAMAS Congratulations to our partner and friend,DAVID H. LANDE, ESQ on his appointment to Judge in the Division of Workers Compensation.
